Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 868
Filtrar
1.
World J Surg ; 47(11): 2635-2643, 2023 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37530783

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Combat-related gunshot wounds (GSW) may differ from those found in civilian trauma centers. Missile velocity, resources, logistics, and body armor may affect injury patterns and management strategies. This study compares injury patterns, management, and outcomes in isolated abdominal GSW between military (MIL) and civilian (CIV) populations. METHODS: The Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DoDTR) and TQIP databases were queried for patients with isolated abdominal GSW from 2013 to 2016. MIL patients were propensity score matched 1:3 based on age, sex, and extraabdominal AIS. Injury patterns and in-hospital outcomes were compared. Initial operative management strategies, including selective nonoperative management (SNOM) for isolated solid organ injuries, were also compared. RESULTS: Of the 6435 patients with isolated abdominal GSW, 183 (3%) MIL were identified and matched with 549 CIV patients. The MIL group had more hollow viscus injuries (84% vs. 66%) while the CIV group had more vascular injuries (10% vs. 21%) (p < .05 for both). Operative strategy differed, with more MIL patients undergoing exploratory laparotomy (95% vs. 82%) and colectomy (72% vs. 52%) (p < .05 for both). However, no difference in ostomy creation was appreciated. More SNOM for isolated solid organ injuries was performed in the CIV group (34.1% vs. 12.5%; p < 0.05). In-hospital outcomes, including mortality, were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: MIL abdominal GSW lead to higher rates of hollow viscus injuries compared to CIV GSW. MIL GSW are more frequently treated with resection but with similar ostomy creation compared to civilian GSW. SNOM of solid organ injuries is infrequently performed following MIL GSW.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Personal Militar , Centros Traumatológicos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Humanos , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Traumatismos Abdominales/terapia , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Personal Militar/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/diagnóstico , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/epidemiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/cirugía , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/terapia , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , United States Department of Defense/estadística & datos numéricos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina Militar/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
JAMA ; 329(21): 1840-1847, 2023 06 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37278813

RESUMEN

Importance: US hospitals report data on many health care quality metrics to government and independent health care rating organizations, but the annual cost to acute care hospitals of measuring and reporting quality metric data, independent of resources spent on quality interventions, is not well known. Objective: To evaluate externally reported inpatient quality metrics for adult patients and estimate the cost of data collection and reporting, independent of quality-improvement efforts. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective time-driven activity-based costing study at the Johns Hopkins Hospital (Baltimore, Maryland) with hospital personnel involved in quality metric reporting processes interviewed between January 1, 2019, and June 30, 2019, about quality reporting activities in the 2018 calendar year. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes included the number of metrics, annual person-hours per metric type, and annual personnel cost per metric type. Results: A total of 162 unique metrics were identified, of which 96 (59.3%) were claims-based, 107 (66.0%) were outcome metrics, and 101 (62.3%) were related to patient safety. Preparing and reporting data for these metrics required an estimated 108 478 person-hours, with an estimated personnel cost of $5 038 218.28 (2022 USD) plus an additional $602 730.66 in vendor fees. Claims-based (96 metrics; $37 553.58 per metric per year) and chart-abstracted (26 metrics; $33 871.30 per metric per year) metrics used the most resources per metric, while electronic metrics consumed far less (4 metrics; $1901.58 per metric per year). Conclusions and Relevance: Significant resources are expended exclusively for quality reporting, and some methods of quality assessment are far more expensive than others. Claims-based metrics were unexpectedly found to be the most resource intensive of all metric types. Policy makers should consider reducing the number of metrics and shifting to electronic metrics, when possible, to optimize resources spent in the overall pursuit of higher quality.


Asunto(s)
Hospitales , Reportes Públicos de Datos en Atención de Salud , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Humanos , Atención a la Salud/economía , Atención a la Salud/normas , Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales/normas , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales/provisión & distribución , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/economía , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/economía , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/normas , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguridad del Paciente/economía , Seguridad del Paciente/normas , Seguridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Economía Hospitalaria/estadística & datos numéricos
3.
JAMA Pediatr ; 177(7): 700-709, 2023 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37252746

RESUMEN

Importance: Although inequitable care due to racism and bias is well documented in health care, the impact on health care-associated infections is less understood. Objective: To determine whether disparities in first central catheter-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates existed for pediatric patients of minoritized racial, ethnic, and language groups and to evaluate the outcomes associated with quality improvement initiatives for addressing these disparities. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study retrospectively examined outcomes of 8269 hospitalized patients with central catheters from October 1, 2012, to September 30, 2019, at a freestanding quaternary care children's hospital. Subsequent quality improvement interventions and follow-up were studied, excluding catheter days occurring after the outcome and episodes with catheters of indeterminate age through September 2022. Exposures: Patient self-reported (or parent/guardian-reported) race, ethnicity, and language for care as collected for hospital demographic purposes. Main Outcomes and Measures: Central catheter-associated bloodstream infection events identified by infection prevention surveillance according to National Healthcare Safety Network criteria were reported as events per 1000 central catheter days. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to analyze patient and central catheter characteristics, and interrupted time series was used to analyze quality improvement outcomes. Results: Unadjusted infection rates were higher for Black patients (2.8 per 1000 central catheter days) and patients who spoke a language other than English (LOE; 2.1 per 1000 central catheter days) compared with the overall population (1.5 per 1000 central catheter days). Proportional hazard regression included 225 674 catheter days with 316 infections and represented 8269 patients. A total of 282 patients (3.4%) experienced a CLABSI (mean [IQR] age, 1.34 [0.07-8.83] years; female, 122 [43.3%]; male, 160 [56.7%]; English-speaking, 236 [83.7%]; LOE, 46 [16.3%]; American Indian or Alaska Native, 3 [1.1%]; Asian, 14 [5.0%]; Black, 26 [9.2%]; Hispanic, 61 [21.6%]; Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, 4 [1.4%]; White, 139 [49.3%]; ≥2 races, 14 [5.0%]; unknown race and ethnicity or refused to answer, 15 [5.3%]). In the adjusted model, a higher hazard ratio (HR) was observed for Black patients (adjusted HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.6; P = .002) and patients who spoke an LOE (adjusted HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.3; P = .01). Following quality improvement interventions, infection rates in both subgroups showed statistically significant level changes (Black patients: -1.77; 95% CI, -3.39 to -0.15; patients speaking an LOE: -1.25; 95% CI, -2.23 to -0.27). Conclusions and Relevance: The study's findings show disparities in CLABSI rates for Black patients and patients who speak an LOE that persisted after adjusting for known risk factors, suggesting that systemic racism and bias may play a role in inequitable hospital care for hospital-acquired infections. Stratifying outcomes to assess for disparities prior to quality improvement efforts may inform targeted interventions to improve equity.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Infección Hospitalaria , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Sepsis , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/etnología , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sepsis/epidemiología , Sepsis/etnología , Sepsis/etiología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/etnología , Minorías Étnicas y Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Lenguaje , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/estadística & datos numéricos , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupos Raciales/etnología , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Barreras de Comunicación , Preescolar , Indio Americano o Nativo de Alaska/estadística & datos numéricos , Racismo Sistemático/etnología , Racismo Sistemático/estadística & datos numéricos , Asiático/estadística & datos numéricos , Nativos de Hawái y Otras Islas del Pacífico/estadística & datos numéricos , Blanco/estadística & datos numéricos
5.
JAMA ; 328(16): 1616-1623, 2022 10 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36282256

RESUMEN

Importance: Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced (BPCI-A) is a Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) initiative that aims to produce financial savings by incentivizing decreases in clinical spending. Incentives consist of financial bonuses from CMS to hospitals or penalties paid by hospitals to CMS. Objective: To investigate the association of hospital participation in BPCI-A with spending, and to characterize hospitals receiving financial bonuses vs penalties. Design, Setting, and Participants: Difference-in-differences and cross-sectional analyses of 4 754 139 patient episodes using 2013-2019 US Medicare claims at 694 participating and 2852 nonparticipating hospitals merged with hospital and market characteristics. Exposures: BPCI-A model years 1 and 2 (October 1, 2018, through December 31, 2019). Main Outcomes and Measures: Hospitals' per-episode spending, CMS gross and net spending, and the incentive allocated to each hospital. Results: The study identified 694 participating hospitals. The analysis observed a -$175 change in mean per-episode spending (95% CI, -$378 to $28) and an aggregate spending change of -$75.1 million (95% CI, -$162.1 million to $12.0 million) across the 428 670 episodes in BPCI-A model years 1 and 2. However, CMS disbursed $354.3 million (95% CI, $212.0 million to $496.0 million) more in bonuses than it received in penalties. Hospital participation in BPCI-A was associated with a net loss to CMS of $279.2 million (95% CI, $135.0 million to $423.0 million). Hospitals in the lowest quartile of Medicaid days received a mean penalty of $0.41 million; (95% CI, $0.09 million to $0.72 million), while those in the highest quartile received a mean bonus of $1.57 million; (95% CI, $1.09 million to $2.08 million). Similar patterns were observed for hospitals across increasing quartiles of Disproportionate Share Hospital percentage and of patients from racial and ethnic minority groups. Conclusions and Relevance: Among US hospitals measured between 2013 and 2019, participation in BPCI-A was significantly associated with an increase in net CMS spending. Bonuses accrued disproportionately to hospitals providing care for marginalized communities.


Asunto(s)
Costos de Hospital , Medicare , Motivación , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Anciano , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales/normas , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/economía , Medicare/normas , Grupos Minoritarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente/economía , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente/normas , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/economía , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Marginación Social
7.
Pediatr Diabetes ; 23(1): 55-63, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34708486

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: In patients treated for DKA, decrease the rate of visits experiencing one or more BG < 80 mg/dl by 10% within 24 months. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Plan-do-study-act cycles tested interventions linked to key drivers including: standardized DKA guidelines incorporating a two-bag fluid system, efficient ordering process, and care team education. Inclusion criterion: treatment for DKA with a bicarbonate value (HCO3 ) <15 mEq/L. PRIMARY OUTCOME: the percent of patient visits experiencing a BG < 80 mg/dl while undergoing treatment for DKA. Process measures included: order panel and order set utilization rates. Balancing measures included: emergency department and hospital lengths of stay, time to acidosis resolution (time to HCO3 ≥ 17 mEq/L), and admission rates. Outcomes were analyzed using statistical process control charts. RESULTS: From January 2017 through May 2021, our institution treated 288 different patients during 557 visits for suspected DKA. Following our interventions, the overall percent of patient visits for DKA with a BG < 80 mg/dl improved from 32% to 5%. The team did see small improvements in emergency department and hospital lengths of stay; otherwise, there was no significant change in our balancing measures. CONCLUSIONS: Use of quality improvement methodology and standardized DKA management resulted in a significant reduction of BG < 80 mg/dl in patients treated for DKA.


Asunto(s)
Cetoacidosis Diabética/complicaciones , Hipoglucemia/complicaciones , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Niño , Cetoacidosis Diabética/epidemiología , Femenino , Fluidoterapia/métodos , Fluidoterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales/normas , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Hipoglucemia/epidemiología , Masculino , Readmisión del Paciente/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Wisconsin/epidemiología
8.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 91(4): 590-598, 2021 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34559162

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Children with low-grade blunt solid organ injury (SOI) have historically been admitted to an inpatient setting for monitoring, but the evidence supporting the necessity of this practice is lacking. The purpose of this study was to quantify the frequency and timing of intervention for hemorrhage and to describe hospital-based resource utilization for low-grade SOI in the absence of other major injuries (OMIs). METHODS: A cohort of children (aged <16 years) with blunt American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade 1 or 2 SOI from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program registry (2007-2017) was analyzed. Children were excluded if they had confounding factors associated with intervention for hemorrhage (comorbidities, OMIs, or extra-abdominal surgical procedures). Outcomes included frequency and timing of intervention (laparotomy, angiography, or transfusion) for hemorrhage, as well as hospital-based resource utilization. RESULTS: A total of 1,019 children were identified with low-grade blunt SOI and no OMIs. Nine hundred eighty-six (96.8%) of these children were admitted to an inpatient unit. Admitted children with low-grade SOI had a median length-of-stay of 2 days and a 23.9% intensive care unit admission rate. Only 1.7% (n = 17) of patients with low-grade SOI underwent an intervention, with the median time to intervention being the first hospital day. No child who underwent angiography was transfused or had an abnormal initial ED shock index. CONCLUSION: Children with low-grade SOI are routinely admitted to the hospital and often to the intensive care unit but rarely undergo hospital-based intervention. The most common intervention was angiography, with questionable indications in this cohort. These data question the need for inpatient admission for low-grade SOI and suggest that discharge from the emergency room may be safe. Prospective investigation into granular risk factors to identify the rare patient needing hospital-based intervention is needed, as is validation of the safety of ambulatory management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and epidemiological, level III.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominales/terapia , Adolescente , Angiografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Monitoreo Fisiológico/estadística & datos numéricos , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas no Penetrantes/terapia
9.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(9): e2125173, 2021 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34546374

RESUMEN

Importance: Despite billions spent in public investment, electronic health records (EHRs) have not delivered on the promise of large quality and safety improvement. Simultaneously, there is debate on whether public quality reporting is a useful tool to incentivize quality improvement. Objective: To evaluate whether publicly reported feedback was associated with hospital improvement in an evaluation of medication-related clinical decision support (CDS) safety performance. Design, Settings, and Participants: This nonrandomized controlled trial included US hospitals that participated in the Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) Evaluation Tool in the Leapfrog Hospital Survey, a national quality reporting program that evaluates safety performance of hospital CDS using simulated orders and patients, in 2017 to 2018. A sharp regression discontinuity design was used to identify the association of receiving negative feedback with hospital performance improvement in the subsequent year. Data were analyzed from January through September 2020. Exposures: Publicly reported quality feedback. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was improvement from 2017 to 2018 on the Leapfrog CPOE Evaluation Tool, using regression discontinuity model estimates of the association of receiving negative publicly reported feedback with quality improvement. Results: A total of 1183 hospitals were included, with a mean (SD) CPOE score of 59.3% (16.3%) at baseline. Hospitals receiving negative feedback improved 8.44 (95% CI, 0.09 to 16.80) percentage points more in the subsequent year compared with hospitals that received positive feedback on the same evaluation. This change was driven by differences in improvement in basic CDS capabilities (ß = 8.71 [95%CI, 1.67 to 18.73]) rather than advanced CDS (ß = 6.15 [95% CI, -9.11 to 26.83]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this nonrandomized controlled trial, publicly reported feedback was associated with quality improvement, suggesting targeted measurement and reporting of process quality may be an effective policy lever to encourage improvement in specific areas. Clinical decision support represents an important tool in ensuring patient safety and decreasing adverse drug events, especially for complex patients and those with multiple chronic conditions who often receive several different drugs during an episode of care.


Asunto(s)
Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Reportes Públicos de Datos en Atención de Salud , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Administración de la Seguridad/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Hospitales/normas , Humanos , Sistemas de Entrada de Órdenes Médicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Regresión , Administración de la Seguridad/normas , Estados Unidos
10.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(8): e2119769, 2021 08 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34357394

RESUMEN

Importance: Engaging multidisciplinary care teams in surgical practice is important for the improvement of surgical outcomes. Objective: To evaluate the association of multiple Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways with ERAS guideline adherence and outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This quality improvement study compared a pre-ERAS cohort (2013-2017) with a post-ERAS cohort (2014-2018). All patients were from Alberta Health Services in Alberta, Canada, and had available ERAS and up to 1-year postsurgery administrative data. Data collected included age, sex, body mass index, tobacco and alcohol use, diabetes, comorbidity index, and surgical characteristics. Data analysis was performed from May 7, 2020, to February 1, 2021. Interventions: Implementation of 5 ERAS pathways (colorectal, liver, pancreas, gynecologic oncology, and radical cystectomy) across 9 sites. Main Outcomes and Measures: Adherence to ERAS guidelines was measured by the percentage of patients whose care met the common ERAS pathway care element criteria. Surgical procedures were grouped by complexity; complications were classified by severity. Outcome measures for the pre-post-ERAS cohorts included length of stay (LOS), readmission, complications, and mortality. Results: A total of 7757 patients participated in the study, including 984 in the pre-ERAS cohort (median [interquartile range] age, 62 [53-71] years; 526 [53.5%] female) and 6773 in the post-ERAS cohort (median [interquartile range] age, 62 [53-71] years; 3470 [51.2%] male). In the total cohort, care-element adherence improved from 52% to 76% (P < .001), no significant differences were found in serious complications (from 6.2% to 4.9%; P = .08) or 30-day mortality (from 0.71% to 0.93%; P = .50), 1-year mortality decreased from 7.1% to 4.6% (P < .001), mean (SD) LOS decreased from 9.4 (7.0) to 7.8 (5.0) days (P < .001), and 30-day readmission rates were unchanged (from 13.4% to 11.7%; P = .12). After adjustment for patient characteristics, the LOS mean difference decreased 0.71 days (95% CI, -1.13 to -0.29 days; P < .001), with no significant differences in adjusted 30-day readmission (-3.5%; 95% CI, -22.7% to 20.4%; P = .75), serious complications (1.3%; 95% CI, -26.2% to 39.0%; P = .94), or mortality (30-day mortality: 42% [95% CI, -35.4% to 212.3%]; P = .38; 1-year mortality: 8% [95% CI, -20.5% to 46.8%]; P = .62). The adjusted 1-year readmission rate was -15.6% (95% CI, -27.7% to -1.5%; P = .03) in favor of ERAS, and readmission LOS was shorter by 1.7 days (95% CI, -3.3 to -0.1 days; P = .04). Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this quality improvement study suggest that implementation of ERAS across multiple pathways may improve health care practitioner adherence to ERAS guidelines, LOS, and readmission rates at a system level.


Asunto(s)
Recuperación Mejorada Después de la Cirugía/normas , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/cirugía , Enfermería Posanestésica/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Medicina Estatal/organización & administración , Anciano , Alberta , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Readmisión del Paciente/normas , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermería Posanestésica/estadística & datos numéricos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina Estatal/estadística & datos numéricos
11.
Urology ; 156: 117-123, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34331999

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe factors associated with Quality improvement and patient safety (QIPS) participation using 2018 American Urological Association Census data. QIPS have become increasingly important in medicine. However, studies about QIPS in urology suggest low levels of participation, with little known about factors predicting non-participation. METHODS: Results from 2339 census respondents were weighted to estimate 12,660 practicing urologists in the United States. Our primary outcome was participation in QIPS. Predictor variables included demographics, practice setting, rurality, fellowship training, QIPS domains in practice, years in practice, and non-clinical/clinical workload. RESULTS: QIPS participants and non-participants significantly differed in distributions of age (P = .0299), gender (P = .0013), practice setting (P <.0001), employment (employee vs partner vs owner vs combination; P <.0001), and fellowship training (P <.0001). QIPS participants reported fewer years in practice (21.3 vs 25.9, P = .018) and higher clinical (45.2 vs 39.2, P = .022) and non-clinical (8.76 vs 5.28, P = .002) work hours per week. Non-participation was associated with male gender (OR = 2.68, 95% CI 1.03-6.95) and Asian race (OR = 2.59, 95% CI 1.27-5.29) for quality programs and private practice settings (ORs = 8.72-27.8) for patient safety initiatives. CONCLUSION: QIPS was associated with academic settings. Interventions to increase rates of quality and safety participation should target individual and system-level factors, respectively. Future work should discern barriers to QIPS engagement and its clinical benefits.


Asunto(s)
Seguridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Urólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Urología/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Educación Médica Continua/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Práctica Institucional/organización & administración , Práctica Institucional/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Práctica Privada/organización & administración , Práctica Privada/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Raciales , Factores Sexuales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos , Urólogos/educación , Urología/educación
12.
Malar J ; 20(1): 289, 2021 Jun 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34187481

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Demand for high-quality surveillance data for malaria, and other diseases, is greater than ever before. In Uganda, the primary source of malaria surveillance data is the Health Management Information System (HMIS). However, HMIS data may be incomplete, inaccurate or delayed. Collaborative improvement (CI) is a quality improvement intervention developed in high-income countries, which has been advocated for low-resource settings. In Kayunga, Uganda, a pilot study of CI was conducted in five public health centres, documenting a positive effect on the quality of HMIS and malaria surveillance data. A qualitative evaluation was conducted concurrently to investigate the mechanisms of effect and unintended consequences of the intervention, aiming to inform future implementation of CI. METHODS: The study intervention targeted health workers, including brief in-service training, plus CI with 'plan-do-study-act' (PDSA) cycles emphasizing self-reflection and group action, periodic learning sessions, and coaching from a CI mentor. Health workers collected data on standard HMIS out-patient registers. The qualitative evaluation (July 2015 to September 2016) included ethnographic observations at each health centre (over 12-14 weeks), in-depth interviews with health workers and stakeholders (n = 20), and focus group discussions with health workers (n = 6). RESULTS: The results suggest that the intervention did facilitate improvement in data quality, but through unexpected mechanisms. The CI intervention was implemented as planned, but the PDSA cycles were driven largely by the CI mentor, not the health workers. In this context, characterized by a rigid hierarchy within the health system of limited culture of self-reflection and inadequate training and supervision, CI became an effective form of high-quality training with frequent supervisory visits. Health workers appeared motivated to improve data collection habits by their loyalty to the CI mentor and the potential for economic benefits, rather than a desire for self-improvement. CONCLUSIONS: CI is a promising method of quality improvement and could have a positive impact on malaria surveillance data. However, successful scale-up of CI in similar settings may require deployment of highly skilled mentors. Further research, focusing on the effectiveness of 'real world' mentors using robust study designs, will be required to determine whether CI can be translated effectively and sustainably to low-resource settings.


Asunto(s)
Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Pública/métodos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Proyectos Piloto , Salud Pública/estadística & datos numéricos , Uganda
13.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(6): e2114920, 2021 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34185069

RESUMEN

Importance: New Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services waivers created a payment mechanism for hospital at home services. Although it is well established that direct admission to hospital at home from the community as a substitute for hospital care provides superior outcomes and lower cost, the effectiveness of transfer hospital at home-that is, completing hospitalization at home-is unclear. Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of the transfer component of a Veterans Affairs (VA) Hospital in Home program (T-HIH), taking advantage of natural geographical limitations in a program's service area. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this quality improvement study, T-HIH was offered to veterans residing in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and their outcomes were compared with those of propensity-matched veterans residing in adjacent Camden, New Jersey, who were admitted to the VA hospital from 2012 to 2018. Data analysis was performed from October 2019 to May 2020. Intervention: Enrollment in the T-HIH program. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were hospital length of stay, 30-day and 90-day readmissions, VA direct costs, combined VA and Medicare costs, mortality, 90-day nursing home use, and days at home after hospital discharge. An intent-to-treat analysis of cost and utilization was performed. Results: A total of 405 veterans (mean [SD] age, 66.7 [0.83] years; 399 men [98.5%]) with medically complex conditions, primarily congestive heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations (mean [SD] hierarchical condition categories score, 3.54 [0.16]), were enrolled. Ten participants could not be matched, so analyses were performed for 395 veterans (all of whom were men), 98 in the T-HIH group and 297 in the control group. For patients in the T-HIH group compared with the control group, length of stay was 20% lower (6.1 vs 7.7 days; difference, 1.6 days; 95% CI, -3.77 to 0.61 days), VA costs were 20% lower (-$5910; 95% CI, -$13 049 to $1229), combined VA and Medicare costs were 22% lower (-$7002; 95% CI, -$14 314 to $309), readmission rates were similar (23.7% vs 23.0%), the numbers of nursing home days were significantly fewer (0.92 vs 7.45 days; difference, -6.5 days; 95% CI, -12.1 to -0.96 days; P = .02), and the number of days at home was 18% higher (81.4 vs 68.8 days; difference, 12.6 days; 95% CI, 3.12 to 22.08 days; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, T-HIH was significantly associated with increased days at home and less nursing home use but was not associated with increased health care system costs.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/economía , Transferencia de Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Tiempo , Anciano , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud/normas , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/normas , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Philadelphia , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos
14.
PLoS One ; 16(5): e0250920, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33951090

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Over the past few decades, interest in providing and measuring Respectful Maternity Care (RMC) has increased markedly. Sri Lanka is reportedly shown to have better maternal health statistics and studies on quality improvement are lacking in this unique population. We aim to describe healthcare providers' perceptions and women's expectations, perceptions and their gaps in service provision regarding RMC in Sri Lanka. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study with a mixed-methods approach comprising of qualitative component followed by a quantitative component will be conducted in Castle Street Hospital for Women (CSHW) and De Soysa Hospital for Women (DSHW), Colombo, Sri Lanka. Healthcare providers (HCP- doctors, nurses and midwives) and vaginally delivered postnatal women (in postnatal wards and postnatal well-baby clinics) will be recruited through convenience sampling. In-depth interviews will be conducted with each of the four categories. Thematic analysis will be adopted to analyze qualitative data and the findings will further be used to improve the quantitative phase questionnaires. Self-administered questionnaire will be administered to a 378 vaginally delivered postnatal women [quota sampling across ten wards], exploring demographic details, and maternal opinion on various aspects of RMC. Locally validated Women's Perceptions of RMC tool (WP-RMC) will also be used to measure the level of RMC among these postnatal women along with the questionnaire 01. Qualitative findings will be used for cognitive validation of the WP-RMC into the Sri Lankan setting. DISCUSSION: This study will explore HCP's and women's expectations, perceptions and their gaps in service provision regarding RMC in two maternity hospitals in Sri Lanka. Assessment of the quality of care with regards to RMC have not been reported previously in this setting.


Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Materna/estadística & datos numéricos , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Estudios Transversales , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Percepción , Embarazo , Relaciones Profesional-Paciente , Investigación Cualitativa , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Sri Lanka , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos
15.
J Am Coll Surg ; 233(2): 204-211, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34015457

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In 2015, the Ontario Surgical Quality Improvement Network was established to create a community of practice for Ontario hospitals to improve surgical quality. A provincial campaign to decrease postsurgical infections was launched in 2017. STUDY DESIGN: Thirty hospitals implemented activities related to the campaign from April 2018 to March 2019. The community of practice was used to disseminate suggested change ideas in each area. Self-reported data from participating hospitals and collaborative-wide aggregate risk-adjusted data from the American College of Surgeons NSQIP were reviewed to determine the impact of the campaign on the rates of postoperative surgical site infections (SSIs), urinary tract infections (UTIs), and pneumonia. RESULTS: A total of 24, 8, and 2 hospitals selected SSIs, UTIs, and pneumonia, respectively, as their targets for improvement. Three hospitals selected both SSIs and UTIs, 1 hospital selected SSIs and pneumonia, and 1 hospital selected all 3 indicators as targets. Self-reported data demonstrated that the rates of SSIs and UTIs decreased significantly post campaign from 4.87% to 3.99% (p < 0.0001) and from 3.65% to 1.25% (p = 0.007), respectively. Pneumonia rates also decreased from 1.27% to 1.05%. Overall rates of SSIs, UTIs, and pneumonia across all Ontario Surgical Quality Improvement Network hospitals were reduced from 3.4%, 1.29%, and 0.88% to 3.37%, 1.14%, and 0.84%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The 1-year campaign resulted in a clinically significant reduction in the rates of SSIs and UTIs, as well as a trend for decrease in pneumonia incidence among participating hospitals. Using a flexible approach with priority setting and leveraging the community of practice for dissemination of change ideas is an effective way of sustaining quality improvement activities.


Asunto(s)
Neumonía/epidemiología , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/efectos adversos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infecciones Urinarias/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Colaboración Intersectorial , Ontario/epidemiología , Neumonía/etiología , Neumonía/prevención & control , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Infecciones Urinarias/etiología , Infecciones Urinarias/prevención & control
16.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 217(1): 235-244, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33909468

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to describe the results of an ongoing program implemented in an academic radiology department to support the execution of small- to medium-size improvement projects led by frontline staff and leaders. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Staff members were assigned a coach, were instructed in improvement methods, were given time to work on the project, and presented progress to department leaders in weekly 30-minute reports. Estimated costs and outcomes were calculated for each project and aggregated. An anonymous survey was administered to participants at the end of the first year. RESULTS. A total of 73 participants completed 102 projects in the first 2 years of the program. The project type mix included 25 quality improvement projects, 22 patient satisfaction projects, 14 staff engagement projects, 27 efficiency improvement projects, and 14 regulatory compliance and readiness projects. Estimated annualized outcomes included approximately 4500 labor hours saved, $315K in supply cost savings, $42.2M in potential increased revenues, 8- and 2-point increase in top-box patient experience scores at two clinics, and a 60-incident reduction in near-miss safety events. Participant time equated to approximately 0.35 full-time equivalent positions per year. Approximately 0.4 full-time equivalent was required to support the program. Survey results indicated that the participants generally viewed the program favorably. CONCLUSION. The program was successful in providing a platform for simultaneously solving a large number of organizational problems while also providing a positive experience to frontline personnel.


Asunto(s)
Centros Médicos Académicos , Eficiencia Organizacional/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/métodos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud/métodos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Radiología en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/economía , Servicio de Radiología en Hospital/economía
17.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 91(4): 584-589, 2021 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33783419

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric adjusted shock index (SIPA) has demonstrated the ability to prospectively identify children at the highest risk for early mortality. The addition of neurological status to shock index has shown promise as a reliable triage tool in adult trauma populations. This study sought to assess the utility of combining SIPA with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) for predicting early trauma-related outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective review of the 2017 Trauma Quality Improvement Program Database was performed for all severely injured patients younger than 18 years old. Pediatric adjusted shock index and reverse SIPA × GCS (rSIG) were calculated. Age-specific cutoff values were derived for reverse shock index multiplied by GCS (rSIG) and compared with their SIPA counterparts for early mortality assessment using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analyses. RESULTS: A total of 10,389 pediatric patients with an average age of 11.4 years, 67% male, average Injury Severity Score of 24.1, and 4% sustaining a major penetrating injury were included in the analysis. The overall mortality was 9.3%. Furthermore, 32.1% of patients displayed an elevated SIPA score, while only 27.5% displayed a positive rSIG. On area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, rSIG was found to be superior to SIPA as a predictor for in hospital mortality with values of 0.854 versus 0.628, respectively. CONCLUSION: Reverse shock index multiplied by GCS more readily predicted in hospital mortality for pediatric trauma patients when compared with SIPA. These findings suggest that neurological status should be an important factor during initial patient assessment. Further study to assess the applicability of rSIG for expanded trauma-related outcomes in pediatric trauma is necessary. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, level IV.


Asunto(s)
Choque/diagnóstico , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidad , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Pronóstico , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Curva ROC , Valores de Referencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Choque/etiología , Choque/mortalidad , Washingtón/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/complicaciones , Heridas y Lesiones/diagnóstico
20.
Clin Radiol ; 76(8): 626.e13-626.e21, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33714540

RESUMEN

AIM: To audit scanning technique and patient doses for computed tomography (CT) colonography (CTC) examinations in a large UK region and to identify opportunities for quality improvement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Scanning technique and patient dose data were gathered for both contrast-enhanced and unenhanced CTC examinations from 33 imaging protocols across 27 scanners. Measurements of patient weight and effective diameter were also obtained. Imaging protocols were compared to identify technique differences between similar scanners. Scanner average doses were calculated and combined to generate regional diagnostic reference limits (DRLs) for both examinations. RESULTS: The regional DRLs for contrast-enhanced examinations were volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) of 11 and 5 mGy for the two scan phases (contrast-enhanced and either delayed phase or non-contrast enhanced respectively), and dose-length product (DLP) of 740 mGy·cm. For unenhanced examinations, these were 5 mGy and 450 mGy·cm. These are notably lower than the national DRLs of 11 mGy and 950 mGy·cm. Substantial differences in scan technique and doses on similar scanners were identified as areas for quality-improvement action. CONCLUSION: A regional CTC dose audit has demonstrated compliance with national DRLs but marked variation in practice between sites for the dose delivered to patients, notably when scanners of the same type were compared for the same indication. This study demonstrates that the national DRL is too high for current scanner technology and should be revised.


Asunto(s)
Colonografía Tomográfica Computarizada/métodos , Colonografía Tomográfica Computarizada/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Dosis de Radiación , Colon/diagnóstico por imagen , Niveles de Referencia para Diagnóstico , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Radiología , Reino Unido
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...